Registry

Federal Pacific Panel: The Stab-Lok Record, Zinsco and Every Breaker Recall Since 1990

A dated registry of what the CPSC, two courts and insurers actually recorded, set beside the full federal recall record for home circuit breakers and load centers.
Primary data
CPSC Recalls API (full recall list, 10,082 recalls) and ACS 2025 1-year table B25034
Data period
Recalls 1990-01-01 to 2026-11-05; housing stock 2025
Latest release used
2026-11-05
Next release
CPSC posts recalls weekly; ACS 2026 1-year due September 2027
Geography
United States, states
Sources
22 (21 Tier 1)
Short answer

Since 1990, the CPSC has posted 13 recalls of home circuit breakers and load centers, covering 5.02 million units, and none names a federal pacific panel, Stab-Lok or Zinsco. The CPSC closed its FPE inquiry in 1983 without a safety finding; a New Jersey court ruled in 2002 that FPE sold breakers not tested to UL standards.

5.02 millionUS units in 13 residential breaker and panel recalls, 1990 to 2026[1]
0CPSC recalls that name Federal Pacific, Stab-Lok or Zinsco, of 10,082 on file since 1973[1]
71.7%of recalled units sit in two recalls: Siemens 2010 and Square D 2022[1][14][15]
65.7 millionUS housing units built 1950 to 1989, the FPE and Zinsco sales era (2025)[6]

Registry: official actions on FPE, Stab-Lok and every residential breaker and panel recall

Checked monthly against the CPSC Recalls API, and when a court or insurer record changes. Last checked 2026-11-08. Entries are neutral records of public data; each links to its source record.

Body or recallRecorded actionDateEvidenceSource
Federal Pacific Electric Company (FPE)Adopts the STAB-LOK trademark for circuit breakers.1950court recordRecord
Federal Electric Products Co. (later merged into FPE)Registers STAB-LOK in Canada.1952court recordRecord
Reliance Electric Co. (Exxon subsidiary)Acquires FPE; CPSC later notes the breakers it studied were made before this acquisition.1979agency recordRecord
Reliance Electric Co.Reports to CPSC that many FPE circuit breakers did not fully comply with UL requirements; CPSC opens an investigation and its testing confirms failures of certain UL calibration tests.1980-06agency recordRecord
U.S. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCloses the two-year investigation of FPE Stab-Lok residential breakers: available data do not establish a serious risk, staff cannot accept or refute Reliance's position, and further study would cost several million dollars against a $34 million budget.1983-03-03agency recordRecord
Federal Pioneer Ltd. (FPE's Canadian subsidiary)Canadian STAB-LOK registration assigned to Pioneer.1986court recordRecord
Challenger ElectricSells its circuit breaker business, including the US STAB-LOK mark it had acquired from FPE, to the predecessor of American Circuit Breaker Corp.; FPE sells Pioneer to an unrelated Canadian company.1988court recordRecord
Square D (CPSC recall 88022)Before 1990 (context only) recall: GFCI breaker; hazard: protection may fail; 80,000 US units.1988-04-13agency recordRecord
Siemens (I-T-E brand) (CPSC recall 88091)Before 1990 (context only) recall: Load center; hazard: fire or overheating; units not stated.1988-11-01agency recordRecord
Challenger (CPSC recall 88095)Before 1990 (context only) recall: GFCI breaker; hazard: protection may fail; 9,000 US units.1988-11-12agency recordRecord
Siemens (incl. Murray) (CPSC recall 99005)Residential recall: GFCI breaker; hazard: protection may fail; 144,000 US units; no injuries reported.1998-10-07agency recordRecord
Federal Pioneer Ltd.Assigns the Canadian STAB-LOK trademark to its parent, Schneider Canada.1999court recordRecord
Square D (CPSC recall 99100a)Residential recall: Meter and main combo; hazard: shock or arcing; 12,200 US units; no injuries reported.1999-04-22agency recordRecord
Square D (CPSC recall 02556)Commercial (outside the residential count) recall: Molded case breaker; hazard: fire or overheating; 40,000 US units; no injuries reported.2002-08-09agency recordRecord
Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County (Judge Bryan D. Garruto)Memorandum of decision in Yacout v. Federal Pacific: FPE knowingly and purposefully distributed circuit breakers not tested to meet UL standards as indicated on their label.2002-08-15court recordRecord
Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex CountyOrder grants partial summary judgment against FPE under the Consumer Fraud Act; Reliance's successor liability left to the fact-finder; claims on sales before June 29, 1971 and by later home buyers dismissed.2002-10-29court recordRecord
Square D (CPSC recall 05035)Residential recall: AFCI breaker; hazard: protection may fail; 700,000 US units; no injuries reported.2004-11-03agency recordRecord
GE and Midwest (CPSC recall 05515)Residential recall: Meter load center; hazard: fire or overheating; 2,754 US units; no injuries reported.2004-11-19agency recordRecord
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOpinion records that American Circuit Breaker Corp. holds the US STAB-LOK mark and that Federal Pioneer makes black STAB-LOK breakers for it.2005-04-25court recordRecord
Counterfeit Square D (CPSC recall 07036)Residential recall: Branch breaker; hazard: counterfeit, may not trip; 30,000 US units; no injuries reported.2006-11-16agency recordRecord
Counterfeit Square D (CPSC recall 08054)Residential recall: Branch breaker; hazard: counterfeit, may not trip; 64,000 US units; no injuries reported.2007-10-30agency recordRecord
Counterfeit Square D (CPSC recall 08151)Residential recall: Branch breaker; hazard: counterfeit, may not trip; 50,000 US units; no injuries reported.2007-12-27agency recordRecord
Counterfeit Square D (CPSC recall 08286)Residential recall: Branch breaker; hazard: counterfeit, may not trip; 371,000 US units; no injuries reported.2008-05-27agency recordRecord
Counterfeit Square D (CPSC recall 10749)Residential recall: Branch breaker; hazard: counterfeit, may not trip; 43,600 US units; no injuries reported.2010-08-02agency recordRecord
Siemens (incl. Murray) (CPSC recall 10354)Residential recall: Breakers, load centers; hazard: fire or overheating; 2,200,000 US units; no injuries reported.2010-09-23agency recordRecord
U.S. Consumer Product Safety CommissionRevises the 1983 release with a note that the Commission closed the matter without determining the safety of FPE breakers.2011-02-18agency recordRecord
Square D (CPSC recall 14134)Commercial (outside the residential count) recall: Molded case breaker; hazard: fire or overheating; 28,400 US units; no injuries reported.2014-03-18agency recordRecord
Eaton (CPSC recall 15710)Residential recall: Meter breaker; hazard: shock or arcing; 1,100 US units; no injuries reported.2014-12-02agency recordRecord
Square D (CPSC recall 15050)Commercial (outside the residential count) recall: Molded case breaker; hazard: fire or overheating; 62,500 US units; no injuries reported.2014-12-18agency recordRecord
AmTrust Financial Services (insurer)Loss control bulletin recommends replacing all Federal Pacific Stab-Lok panels and breakers with UL listed equipment.2019-05own statementRecord
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (Florida)4-point inspection required for properties over 20 years old, down from 30 (Rule 206).2022-02-01own statementRecord
Square D (CPSC recall 22159)Residential recall: Load center; hazard: fire or overheating; 1,400,000 US units; no injuries reported.2022-06-16agency recordRecord
Siemens (incl. Murray) (CPSC recall 24346)Residential recall: Solar meter combo; hazard: fire or overheating; 3,910 US units; no injuries reported.2024-08-22agency recordRecord
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (Florida)Issues 4-Point form Insp4pt 03 25: inspectors record main panel brand and model, panel age, year last updated and listed hazards.2025-03-20own statementRecord
Internal Revenue ServiceLast day property can be placed in service for the 25C credit, which covered panelboards of 200 amps or more up to $600 per item.2025-12-31agency recordRecord

No CPSC recall has ever named a Federal Pacific panel, Stab-Lok or Zinsco

KBR pulled every recall in the CPSC Recalls API on 2026-11-08: 10,082 records dated 1973-06-08 to 2026-11-05. A text search of titles, descriptions and product names for Federal Pacific, Stab-Lok, Zinsco and FPE returns 0 relevant recalls.

The only FPE hit in the full file is a Honda ATV recall whose model list includes the code FPE; it is logged and removed. Challenger, the brand that later carried the Stab-Lok line, appears once in the breaker set: a 1988 replacement program for about 9,000 HAGF GFCI breakers that had not been located (CPSC release 88-095).

No recall is not the same as a safety finding. The CPSC did investigate FPE Stab-Lok breakers from 1980 to 1983, and it closed that file without ruling either way, as the next section shows. The absence of a Zinsco record means the agency never announced a recall or an investigation outcome for that brand in the database it publishes.

Reliance flagged the UL test failures in 1980, and the CPSC closed the file in 1983 without a safety finding

The CPSC's own release, issued 1983-03-03 and revised 2011-02-18, is the primary federal record. It confirms the test failures and declines to call them a hazard or to clear them.

According to CPSC release 83-008, the investigation began in June 1980 when Reliance Electric, an Exxon subsidiary and FPE's parent, reported that many FPE breakers did not fully comply with Underwriters Laboratories requirements. Commission testing confirmed that the breakers failed certain UL calibration tests. The work focused on 2-pole residential breakers made before Reliance bought FPE in 1979.

Reliance's position, as the release records it, was that the breakers trip reliably at most overload levels and that currents at the few levels where they may not trip are too low to overheat household wiring. CPSC staff said it had insufficient data to accept or refute that. Gathering the data would cost several million dollars, and with a fiscal 1983 budget of $34 million the Commission chose not to continue, while saying it could reopen the matter.

The revision dated 2011-02-18 adds a note asking electricians, homeowners, inspectors and agents to read the release carefully: the Commission closed the matter without determining the safety of FPE breakers or the accuracy of the maker's position.

Calibration test: A UL test that checks whether a breaker holds its rated current and trips within set time limits when current exceeds that rating, as the CPSC release describes it.

A New Jersey judge found in 2002 that FPE sold breakers not tested to UL standards

The court record is narrower than many summaries suggest: a partial summary judgment on consumer fraud against FPE, with successor liability, limitations and class questions left open.

In Yacout v. Federal Pacific Electric Co., docket MID-L-2904-97, Judge Bryan D. Garruto's memorandum dated 2002-08-15 states that FPE knowingly and purposefully distributed circuit breakers which were not tested to meet UL standards as indicated on their label, an unlawful practice under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. The order dated 2002-10-29 granted summary judgment against FPE on that issue and found an ascertainable loss for which treble damages are recoverable (archived copy of the order and memorandum).

The same order denied summary judgment against Reliance Electric because its successor liability was a question of fact, dismissed claims on sales before June 29, 1971, when the Act first allowed private suits, and dismissed claims by later buyers of homes that already had FPE breakers. The memorandum notes that defendants addressed the labeling issue in the early 1980s through press releases and 48,000 notification letters, and that each class member's limitations defense would need its own hearing.

KBR could not open a primary record of what happened after the order, including any settlement terms, so none is reported here. Several pages state that the suit was filed in 2002; the docket number, MID-L-2904-97, carries a 1997 year suffix.

What regulators and courts recorded about FPE and the Stab-Lok name Download CSV
DateBodyActionEvidence
1950Federal Pacific Electric Company (FPE)Adopts the STAB-LOK trademark for circuit breakers.court record
1952Federal Electric Products Co. (later merged into FPE)Registers STAB-LOK in Canada.court record
1979Reliance Electric Co. (Exxon subsidiary)Acquires FPE; CPSC later notes the breakers it studied were made before this acquisition.agency record
1980-06Reliance Electric Co.Reports to CPSC that many FPE circuit breakers did not fully comply with UL requirements; CPSC opens an investigation and its testing confirms failures of certain UL calibration tests.agency record
1983-03-03U.S. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCloses the two-year investigation of FPE Stab-Lok residential breakers: available data do not establish a serious risk, staff cannot accept or refute Reliance's position, and further study would cost several million dollars against a $34 million budget.agency record
1986Federal Pioneer Ltd. (FPE's Canadian subsidiary)Canadian STAB-LOK registration assigned to Pioneer.court record
1988Challenger ElectricSells its circuit breaker business, including the US STAB-LOK mark it had acquired from FPE, to the predecessor of American Circuit Breaker Corp.; FPE sells Pioneer to an unrelated Canadian company.court record
1999Federal Pioneer Ltd.Assigns the Canadian STAB-LOK trademark to its parent, Schneider Canada.court record
2002-08-15Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County (Judge Bryan D. Garruto)Memorandum of decision in Yacout v. Federal Pacific: FPE knowingly and purposefully distributed circuit breakers not tested to meet UL standards as indicated on their label.court record
2002-10-29Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex CountyOrder grants partial summary judgment against FPE under the Consumer Fraud Act; Reliance's successor liability left to the fact-finder; claims on sales before June 29, 1971 and by later home buyers dismissed.court record
2005-04-25U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOpinion records that American Circuit Breaker Corp. holds the US STAB-LOK mark and that Federal Pioneer makes black STAB-LOK breakers for it.court record
2011-02-18U.S. Consumer Product Safety CommissionRevises the 1983 release with a note that the Commission closed the matter without determining the safety of FPE breakers.agency record

Only agency and court records; inspector and press claims are excluded.

Source: [3][4][5] U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (via law.resource.org)

The Stab-Lok name outlived FPE and passed to Challenger, then American Circuit Breaker

A 2005 federal appeals opinion traces the trademark, which matters because a breaker marked Stab-Lok can be newer than FPE itself.

The Ninth Circuit's opinion in American Circuit Breaker Corp. v. Oregon Breakers records that FPE adopted STAB-LOK for breakers in 1950 and later sold its US breaker business, with the mark, to Challenger Electric. In 1988 Challenger sold that business to the predecessor of American Circuit Breaker Corp. (ACBC). The Canadian mark went to FPE's subsidiary Federal Pioneer in 1986 and to Schneider Canada in 1999.

The court notes that ACBC made black STAB-LOK breakers in North Carolina before 1993 and that Federal Pioneer now makes them for ACBC under a settlement. A replacement Stab-Lok breaker bought in the US today is therefore not an FPE product.

Zinsco has no comparable public record that KBR could open: no CPSC recall, no court opinion and no agency statement. Ownership histories that link Zinsco to GTE Sylvania circulate on inspection sites without primary documents, so this report leaves them out (see excluded.md).

13 residential breaker and panel recalls since 1990 covered 5.02 million units

This is KBR's signature count: every CPSC recall since 1990 of a breaker, AFCI or GFCI breaker, load center, panelboard or meter-panel combo sold for homes, from the full API file.

From 1990-01-01 to 2026-11-05 the CPSC posted 13 residential recalls in this category with 5,022,564 announced US units. Siemens, including its Murray brand, leads with 3 recalls and 46.7% of units; Square D genuine products follow with 3 recalls and 42.1%. GE with Midwest Electric and Eaton each have one small meter-panel recall.

Two recalls hold 71.7% of recalled units

US units announced, 13 residential breaker and panel recalls, 1990 to 2026

Two recalls hold 71.7% of recalled unitsHorizontal bar chart of 13 CPSC recalls. Siemens 2010 breakers and load centers 2.2 million units, Square D QO Plug-On Neutral load centers 2022 1.4 million, Square D AFCI 2004 700,000, counterfeit QO breakers from Specialty Lamp 2008 371,000, down to Eaton meter breakers 2014 at 1,100.unitsSiemens 20102,200,000Square D QO PON 20221,400,000Square D AFCI 2004700,000Fake QO, SLI 2008371,000Siemens GFCI 1998144,000Fake QO, CT Elec. 200764,000Fake QO, NABCO 200750,000Fake QO, Miami 201043,600Fake QO, Scott 200630,000Square D CSED 199912,200Siemens solar 20243,910GE meter center 20042,754Eaton meter 20141,100

Source: KBR analysis of the CPSC Recalls API, pulled 2026-11-08

The distribution is lopsided. The median recall covered 50,000 units and the mean 386,351, because the 2010 Siemens recall (2.2 million) and the 2022 Square D recall (1.4 million) together hold 71.7% of the total. Recalls came in 10 of the 37 calendar years from 1990 to 2026, with the busiest decade the 2000s at 6.

Breaker and panel recalls by decade

Residential CPSC recalls per decade, 2020s through 2026-11-05

Breaker and panel recalls by decadeBar chart: 2 residential breaker or panel recalls in the 1990s, 6 in the 2000s, 3 in the 2010s and 2 in the 2020s through November 5, 2026.02468recalls21990s62000s32010s22020s

Source: KBR analysis of the CPSC Recalls API

A kitchen wall opened to the studs with new electrical boxes and cable during a remodel
Illustrative photograph. Generated image, not a specific project.

Three recalls of large molded-case breakers sold through industrial distributors (Square D MA/MH in 2002, F and K frame in 2014, PowerPact J-frame in 2014) are listed in the table but kept out of the residential count. Plug-in GFCI devices, surge arresters, safety switches and a meter socket with no breaker are excluded.

Every CPSC recall of residential and commercial circuit breakers, load centers and meter-panel combos since 1990 Download CSV
Recall no.DateMaker or brandProductHazard groupUS unitsScopeInjuries reported
990051998-10-07Siemens (incl. Murray)GFCI breakerProtection may fail144,000residentialNone
99100a1999-04-22Square DMeter and main comboShock or arcing12,200residentialNone
025562002-08-09Square DMolded case breakerFire or overheating40,000commercialNone
050352004-11-03Square DAFCI breakerProtection may fail700,000residentialNone
055152004-11-19GE and MidwestMeter load centerFire or overheating2,754residentialNone
070362006-11-16Counterfeit Square DBranch breakerCounterfeit, may not trip30,000residentialNone
080542007-10-30Counterfeit Square DBranch breakerCounterfeit, may not trip64,000residentialNone
081512007-12-27Counterfeit Square DBranch breakerCounterfeit, may not trip50,000residentialNone
082862008-05-27Counterfeit Square DBranch breakerCounterfeit, may not trip371,000residentialNone
107492010-08-02Counterfeit Square DBranch breakerCounterfeit, may not trip43,600residentialNone
103542010-09-23Siemens (incl. Murray)Breakers, load centersFire or overheating2,200,000residentialNone
141342014-03-18Square DMolded case breakerFire or overheating28,400commercialNone
157102014-12-02EatonMeter breakerShock or arcing1,100residentialNone
150502014-12-18Square DMolded case breakerFire or overheating62,500commercialNone
221592022-06-16Square DLoad centerFire or overheating1,400,000residentialNone
243462024-08-22Siemens (incl. Murray)Solar meter comboFire or overheating3,910residentialNone

13 residential and 3 commercial recalls, 1990-01-01 to 2026-11-05. Units are announced US units. Injuries column: none of the 16 notices reports an injury.

Source: [1][14][15][16][17][19][20][21] U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

One recalled unit in nine was a counterfeit breaker labeled Square D

Five distributor recalls from 2006 to 2010 pulled 558,600 fake QO-series breakers, 11.1% of all residential units recalled since 1990.

Scott Electric (30,000 units), Connecticut Electric (64,000), North American Breaker Co. (50,000), Specialty Lamp International (371,000) and Miami Breaker (43,600) each recalled breakers labeled Square D that Square D had determined were counterfeit and could fail to trip on overload. Counting genuine and counterfeit together, products bearing the Square D name are 2,670,800 units, or 53.2% of the residential total.

By hazard, fire or overheating covers 71.8% of units, a protection function that may fail (the 1998 Siemens GFCI breakers and the 2004 Square D AFCIs) 16.8%, and shock or arcing in meter-panel combos 0.3%.

Residential recall units by maker and by hazard, 1990 to 2026 Download CSV
GroupTypeRecallsUS unitsShare of units (%)
Siemens (incl. Murray)Maker or brand32,347,91046.7
Square DMaker or brand32,112,20042.1
Counterfeit Square DMaker or brand5558,60011.1
GE and MidwestMaker or brand12,7540.1
EatonMaker or brand11,1000.0
Fire or overheatingHazard43,606,66471.8
Protection may failHazard2844,00016.8
Counterfeit, may not tripHazard5558,60011.1
Shock or arcingHazard213,3000.3

Counterfeit Square D breakers were recalled by distributors, not by Square D. Hazard groups are KBR's grouping of each notice's hazard text.

Source: [1] U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

65.7 million homes standing in 2025 were built in the 1950 to 1989 panel era

ACS 2025 1-year table B25034 counts 65,733,775 housing units built 1950 to 1989, 44.3% of 148,228,967. This is an era count only: no federal survey records panel brands.

The 1970s contributed the most surviving homes, 20,085,485, followed by the 1980s at 18,379,462. The decades overlap the years FPE and Zinsco equipment was sold; an insurer bulletin from AmTrust puts Stab-Lok installations at 1960 to 1985, its own claim. Many of these homes have had panels replaced, which the ACS does not track.

The 1970s built the most homes of the era

US housing units standing in 2025, by decade built, millions

The 1970s built the most homes of the eraBar chart of US housing units in 2025 by decade built: 1950s 13.23 million, 1960s 14.03 million, 1970s 20.09 million, 1980s 18.38 million, for 65.7 million in all.0510.015.020.025.0million homes13.21950s14.01960s20.11970s18.41980s

Source: Census ACS 2025 1-year table B25034

California holds 8,220,599 era homes, 54.8% of its stock, followed by Texas (4,927,913), Florida (4,905,504), New York (3,731,261) and Pennsylvania (2,638,031). Those five states hold 37.2% of the national era count. By share, Hawaii (58.1%), Alaska (57.0%) and Connecticut (52.5%) rank highest; DC (28.3%) and Nevada (31.1%) lowest. For a home-by-home check, see how old is my house.

Share of homes built 1950 to 1989

Percent of all housing units, by state, 2025

Share of homes built 1950 to 1989US tile map of the share of housing units built 1950 to 1989 in 2025. Highest: Hawaii 58.1%, Alaska 57.0%, California 54.8%, Connecticut 52.5%. Lowest: DC 28.3%, Nevada 31.1%. National 44.3%.AK: 57.0AK57.0ME: 39.9ME39.9VT: 44.2VT44.2NH: 46.8NH46.8WA: 39.7WA39.7ID: 34.2ID34.2MT: 39.2MT39.2ND: 41.4ND41.4MN: 43.0MN43.0IL: 46.2IL46.2WI: 42.4WI42.4MI: 49.3MI49.3NY: 42.7NY42.7RI: 48.4RI48.4MA: 41.9MA41.9OR: 41.8OR41.8NV: 31.1NV31.1WY: 46.6WY46.6SD: 36.8SD36.8IA: 39.3IA39.3IN: 42.6IN42.6OH: 46.3OH46.3PA: 44.8PA44.8NJ: 49.1NJ49.1CT: 52.5CT52.5CA: 54.8CA54.8UT: 34.5UT34.5CO: 41.1CO41.1NE: 40.7NE40.7MO: 44.8MO44.8KY: 45.3KY45.3WV: 46.2WV46.2VA: 46.2VA46.2MD: 48.6MD48.6DE: 40.2DE40.2AZ: 40.3AZ40.3NM: 48.7NM48.7KS: 45.9KS45.9AR: 44.0AR44.0TN: 42.1TN42.1NC: 36.7NC36.7SC: 38.7SC38.7DC: 28.3DC28.3OK: 49.8OK49.8LA: 49.8LA49.8MS: 46.3MS46.3AL: 44.8AL44.8GA: 37.9GA37.9HI: 58.1HI58.1TX: 38.4TX38.4FL: 45.5FL45.5PR28.3 to 38.738.7 to 41.441.4 to 44.044.0 to 46.246.2 to 48.748.7 to 58.1%

Source: KBR analysis of Census ACS 2025 1-year table B25034

Housing units built 1950 to 1989, by state, 2025 Download CSV
Show all 52 rows
StateBuilt 1950sBuilt 1960sBuilt 1970sBuilt 1980sBuilt 1950 to 1989All housing unitsShare 1950 to 1989 (%)
United States13,234,97814,033,85020,085,48518,379,46265,733,775148,228,96744.3
California1,767,7661,812,5662,438,7222,201,5458,220,59914,994,88754.8
Texas751,796916,6581,554,1811,705,2784,927,91312,847,96438.4
Florida627,029810,6531,563,1141,904,7084,905,50410,788,70945.5
New York1,188,1021,033,673851,381658,1053,731,2618,738,20242.7
Pennsylvania775,689577,678714,468570,1962,638,0315,881,90344.8
Illinois640,588612,562774,667512,1482,539,9655,503,53246.2
Ohio680,431601,557737,493465,4792,484,9605,367,63346.3
Michigan645,796540,267684,413442,7222,313,1984,692,33149.3
North Carolina280,095392,202582,009644,5031,898,8095,167,86536.7
New Jersey499,760485,150449,829445,7161,880,4553,827,54449.1
Georgia243,617330,654535,067685,8391,795,1774,733,61137.9
Virginia285,134361,441531,735568,5691,746,8793,779,30746.2
Tennessee232,382310,710442,298400,3011,385,6913,291,17442.1
Washington205,104281,122476,291400,8321,363,3493,436,80939.7
Arizona147,321205,437467,694538,5311,358,9833,373,27140.3
Indiana307,315303,971386,131302,8741,300,2913,052,61742.6
Massachusetts310,692295,158332,112349,5011,287,4633,072,18541.9
Missouri261,790302,706396,867325,9501,287,3132,876,14744.8
Maryland252,020301,068339,180378,0721,270,3402,613,89848.6
Wisconsin287,244272,817389,823254,8541,204,7382,838,96742.4
Minnesota232,486226,997358,850306,4431,124,7762,614,52943.0
Colorado166,965189,886408,011341,5371,106,3992,692,47041.1
Alabama175,745248,068343,634310,4151,077,8622,406,29944.8
Louisiana170,575223,884368,430310,2191,073,1082,156,51449.8
South Carolina144,948189,754305,581356,909997,1922,579,73838.7
Kentucky173,611204,577309,357249,671937,2162,070,37545.3
Oklahoma159,410188,862309,884245,620903,7761,816,23849.8
Connecticut214,636203,995202,959195,765817,3551,558,23452.5
Oregon134,256159,220318,249187,084798,8091,909,20241.8
Mississippi93,337145,458209,943185,340634,0781,369,51746.3
Arkansas81,517130,533220,501199,083631,6341,435,52944.0
Kansas145,386118,360185,824155,514605,0841,318,10045.9
Iowa139,531139,028191,856106,139576,5541,467,16439.3
New Mexico83,37782,176165,974146,551478,078981,59848.7
Utah72,03970,137171,803136,988450,9671,307,03034.5
Nevada32,17365,995152,400180,677431,2451,385,02731.1
West Virginia83,57980,312134,323104,697402,911871,88746.2
Nebraska74,45892,543117,25778,713362,971890,79440.7
Hawaii46,96679,624122,50684,928334,024574,51958.1
New Hampshire39,19350,51894,805125,632310,148662,14246.8
Maine45,40050,692103,437108,606308,135771,48739.9
Idaho45,47645,834127,88070,802289,992849,16234.2
Rhode Island55,75755,82366,49058,439236,509489,07148.4
Montana41,08938,26681,60152,358213,314544,23239.2
Delaware42,25840,65552,43259,101194,446483,49740.2
Alaska12,00724,01574,11478,403188,539330,53857.0
North Dakota29,51228,14860,13841,161158,959384,24741.4
South Dakota32,15933,11955,81936,946158,043429,62936.8
Vermont20,36126,87549,18456,767153,187346,27544.2
Wyoming20,20620,56354,99836,545132,312283,77046.6
District of Columbia36,89431,88319,77016,686105,233371,59728.3

An era count of all housing units built in the decades FPE and Zinsco panels were sold, not a count of homes with those panels.

Source: [6][7] U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Census Bureau

Insurers ask for the panel brand: Citizens' 4-point form and an AmTrust bulletin

Published insurer documents show two approaches: Florida's Citizens Property Insurance Corporation asks the inspector to record brand, age and hazards, while one commercial insurer's bulletin recommends replacing every Stab-Lok panel.

Citizens Property Insurance Corporation requires a 4-point inspection for properties over 20 years old, down from 30, for policies effective on or after 2022-02-01 (Citizens bulletin). In 2026 that line covers every Florida home built 1999 or earlier: 6,750,583 units, 62.6% of the state's 10,788,709.

The form in use since 2025-03-20, Insp4pt 03 25, asks for main panel brand and model, panel age and year last updated, and lists hazards such as double taps, scorching and improper breaker size. It names no panel brand as ineligible. It does tell agents they may not submit properties with electrical systems that are not in good working order or have existing hazards.

AmTrust's Florida region Safety Zone bulletin of May 2019 recommends that all Federal Pacific Stab-Lok panels and breakers be replaced with UL listed equipment. The bulletin calls the New Jersey law the NY Consumer Fraud Act; the court record shows New Jersey. Readers comparing insurer rules for older wiring can see knob and tube wiring, which covers different filings.

Insurer rules and federal incentives that touch an old panel Download CSV
BodyDatePosition or ruleFigureType
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation2022-02-014-point inspection required for properties over 20 years old (was 30)20 yearsInsurer rule (Florida)
Citizens Property Insurance Corporation2025-03-20Form Insp4pt 03 25 asks main panel brand/model, panel age and year last updated; agents may not submit properties with electrical hazardsno brand listInsurer form (Florida)
AmTrust Financial Services2019-05Recommends replacing all FPE Stab-Lok panels and breakers with UL listed equipmentinstalled 1960 to 1985 (its claim)Insurer bulletin
Internal Revenue Service2023 to 2025-12-3125C credit for panelboards, sub-panelboards, branch circuits, feeders of 200 amps or more$600 per item; 30% of cost; $1,200 annual capFederal tax credit (ended)
U.S. Congress, 42 U.S.C. 18795ain force 2026HEEHR rebate for an electric load service center upgrade, income-qualifiedup to $4,000; wiring up to $2,500; $14,000 totalFederal rebate run by states

Positions are each body's own statements. Not insurance or tax advice.

Source: [8][9][10][11][12][22] Citizens Property Insurance Corporation; Citizens Property Insurance Corporation; Citizens Property Insurance Corporation; Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Congress, via Cornell Legal Information Institute; AmTrust Financial Services

How to read the panel label without guessing the brand's history

Official recall notices give exact identifiers for recalled panels and breakers; for FPE, the trademark record explains why a Stab-Lok label alone does not date a part.

CPSC notices place catalog numbers and date codes on labels inside the panel box or door, and for the 2022 Square D recall they direct consumers to a qualified electrician to read interior date codes. Counterfeit Square D QO breakers can be told from genuine ones by the white amp rating on the handle, the Square D insignia molded on the side and a yellow chromate mounting clip, per the CPSC's 2008 notice.

How to identify a Stab-Lok, Challenger or recalled panel from official records Download CSV
What to checkWhereWhat the record saysSource
Maker name and catalog numberLabel inside the panel doorCPSC recall notices for Siemens (2010) and Square D (2022) locate catalog numbers and date codes on labels inside the box or doorCPSC recalls 10-354, 22-159
Stab-Lok nameBreakers and panel labelSTAB-LOK has been a breaker trademark since 1950; after FPE it passed to Challenger and then American Circuit Breaker Corp., so the name alone does not date the partNinth Circuit 2005
Challenger namePanel door handle or label on the back of the doorChallenger HAGF GFCI breakers made Feb 22 to Apr 29, 1988 were replaced under a CPSC programCPSC 88-095
Square D QO Plug-On Neutral load centerInterior date code (electrician) or outdoor coverMade Feb 2020 to Jan 2022, date codes 200561 to 220233; free inspection and repairCPSC 22-159
Siemens or Murray breakerSide labelDate codes 0610 or 0710 on Q and MP breakers in the 2010 recallCPSC 10-354
Genuine Square D QO breakerHandle, side and mounting clipWhite amp rating on the handle, Square D insignia molded on the side, yellow chromate clip; counterfeits lack theseCPSC 08-286
Square D QO or Homeline AFCILabel above the wiring terminalBlue test button and red date codes CN to JN in the 2004 recallCPSC 05-035

Opening a live panel is hazardous; CPSC notices direct consumers to a qualified electrician for interior labels.

Source: [5][14][15][16][18][19] U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (via law.resource.org); U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

A closed gray electrical panel door next to a washing machine in a laundry room
Illustrative photograph. Generated image, not a specific project.

What a kitchen or bath remodel means for a 1950 to 1989 panel

No federal rule requires replacing a panel during a remodel; permits, local code and insurers decide. Two federal incentives set the only dollar figures KBR could verify.

The CPSC's standing advice in its 1983 release is to comply with local building codes when wiring or adding circuits and to have breakers of the proper size. New kitchen circuits are reviewed by the local permit office; plan for that step in the kitchen remodel timeline and ask contractors how they handle electrical permits (how to choose a remodeling contractor).

The 25C credit paid 30% of qualified costs, up to $600 per item, for panelboards of 200 amps or more installed to support qualifying energy property, until 2025-12-31 (IRS). The federal HEEHR rebate allows up to $4,000 for an electric load service center upgrade and $2,500 for wiring, within $14,000 per eligible household, for income-qualified homes in states running the program (42 U.S.C. 18795a; DOE).

Other old-house systems that come up in the same remodels are covered in aluminum wiring and polybutylene pipe.

Counts and distributions

Residential breaker and panel recall units since 1990 (signature)

Formulasum of announced US units across the 13 CPSC recalls classed residential, 1990-01-01 to 2026-11-05

Inputs: fact sheet rows 6, 7, 9 to 16, 18, 20, 21 (fact sheet rows)

Result: 5,022,564 units in 13 recalls

The full federal recall record for home breakers and load centers in 37 years is 13 notices, a count no FPE or Zinsco page shows.

Limitations: Announced units, not units still installed. KBR classed each recall as residential or commercial from its sales channel and product text.

Concentration in the two largest recalls

Formula(2,200,000 + 1,400,000) / 5,022,564

Inputs: fact sheet rows 16, 20 (fact sheet rows)

Result: 71.7%

Recall volume is driven by two events, Siemens 2010 and Square D 2022, not a steady flow.

Limitations: Unit counts are as announced by the firm and the CPSC.

Counterfeit share

Formula558,600 / 5,022,564

Inputs: fact sheet rows 11 to 15 (fact sheet rows)

Result: 11.1% (5 recalls)

About one recalled unit in nine was a fake breaker sold under the Square D name.

Limitations: Counts only counterfeits that reached a CPSC recall.

Share of all CPSC recalls

Formula13 / 9,504 recalls since 1990-01-01

Inputs: fact sheet row 2 and the 13 recall rows (fact sheet rows)

Result: 0.14%

Panel and breaker recalls are rare in the CPSC record.

Limitations: A recall count does not measure hazard or failure rates.

Homes from the 1950 to 1989 era

FormulaB25034 E006 + E007 + E008 + E009; share of E001

Inputs: fact sheet rows 45 to 49 (fact sheet rows)

Result: 65,733,775 (44.3%)

Nearly half the US housing stock dates from the decades FPE and Zinsco equipment was sold.

Limitations: An era count, not a count of homes with those panels; MOE about 135,273.

Florida homes past Citizens' 4-point age line

FormulaFlorida B25034 E005 through E011 (built 1999 or earlier)

Inputs: fact sheet rows 50, 51 and table t4 (fact sheet rows)

Result: 6,750,583 (62.6%)

Most Florida homes would need a 4-point inspection, with panel brand recorded, to apply for Citizens coverage.

Limitations: Homes built 2000 to 2005 are also over 20 years old but the ACS bin cannot split them out; the rule applies only to Citizens applicants.

Download the calculations (CSV)

Key findings

  1. The CPSC Recalls API holds 10,082 recalls dated 1973-06-08 to 2026-11-05; none mentions Federal Pacific, Stab-Lok or Zinsco.[1]
  2. From 1990-01-01 to 2026-11-05, 13 CPSC recalls covered residential circuit breakers, AFCI/GFCI breakers, load centers and meter-panel combos, totaling 5,022,564 announced US units.[1]
  3. Those 13 recalls are 0.14% of the 9,504 CPSC recalls posted since 1990.[1]
  4. Siemens and Murray breakers, load centers and meter combos made June to August 2010 account for 2.2 million recalled units, the largest single recall in the set.[15]
  5. Square D QO Plug-On Neutral load centers made February 2020 to January 2022 account for about 1.4 million US units (recall of 2022-06-16), plus 289,000 sold in Canada.[14]
  6. Counterfeit breakers labeled Square D make up 5 recalls and 558,600 units, 11.1% of the residential total, all announced 2006 to 2010.[1][19]
  7. Fire or overheating is the hazard in 4 recalls holding 71.8% of units; a failed AFCI or GFCI protection function accounts for 16.8%.[1]
  8. None of the 13 residential recall notices reports an injury; the 2024 Siemens SolarReady notice cites 8 overheating reports including one localized fire.[1][20]
  9. The CPSC's 1983 release says its investigation began in June 1980, focused on 2-pole residential breakers made before 1979, and was closed because further study would cost several million dollars against a fiscal 1983 budget of $34 million.[3]
  10. On 2011-02-18 the CPSC added a note to the 1983 release saying the Commission closed the matter without determining the safety of FPE breakers.[3]
  11. In Yacout v. Federal Pacific (Middlesex County, New Jersey), the 2002-10-29 order granted summary judgment against FPE under the Consumer Fraud Act but left Reliance Electric's successor liability for trial.[4]
  12. The New Jersey memorandum records that defendants sent 48,000 notification letters about the labeling issue in the early 1980s.[4]
  13. The US STAB-LOK trademark, adopted by FPE in 1950, passed to Challenger Electric and in 1988 to the predecessor of American Circuit Breaker Corp., per a 2005 Ninth Circuit opinion.[5]
  14. In 2025, 65,733,775 US housing units (44.3%) were built 1950 to 1989; California alone has 8,220,599 of them.[6]
  15. Citizens Property Insurance requires a 4-point inspection for Florida homes over 20 years old (formerly 30) from 2022-02-01; 6,750,583 Florida homes were built 1999 or earlier.[10][6]

Executive summary

  • None of the 10,082 recalls in the CPSC Recalls API (1973-06-08 to 2026-11-05) mentions Federal Pacific, Stab-Lok or Zinsco.
  • The CPSC opened an FPE investigation in June 1980 after Reliance Electric reported UL compliance failures, and closed it on 1983-03-03 without a safety determination, citing cost against a $34 million budget.
  • A New Jersey Superior Court memorandum dated 2002-08-15 found FPE knowingly and purposefully distributed breakers not tested to meet UL standards as labeled; the order followed on 2002-10-29.
  • Since 1990 the CPSC posted 13 recalls of residential breakers, AFCI/GFCI breakers, load centers and meter-panel combos, covering 5,022,564 announced US units, with no injuries reported in any notice.
  • Two recalls hold 71.7% of those units: Siemens and Murray breakers and load centers in 2010 (2.2 million) and Square D QO Plug-On Neutral load centers in 2022 (1.4 million).
  • Five recalls, 11.1% of units, were counterfeit breakers labeled Square D, pulled by distributors between 2006 and 2010.
  • The ACS counts 65,733,775 housing units built 1950 to 1989 in 2025, 44.3% of the US stock; that is an era count, not a count of FPE or Zinsco panels.
  • Citizens in Florida has required a 4-point inspection for homes over 20 years old since 2022-02-01, and its 2025 form asks for the panel brand and model.

Questions people ask

Are Federal Pacific panels dangerous?

The federal record does not settle it. CPSC testing confirmed that FPE breakers failed certain UL calibration tests, but on 1983-03-03 the Commission closed its investigation saying the data did not establish a serious risk, and in 2011 it added that it had made no safety determination. A New Jersey court found in 2002 that FPE sold breakers not tested to UL standards as labeled, which is a fraud finding, not a fire-rate finding.

Will insurance cover a house with a Federal Pacific panel?

It depends on the insurer. Citizens in Florida requires a 4-point inspection for homes over 20 years old and its form records the panel brand and model, without naming ineligible brands. AmTrust's 2019 bulletin recommends replacing every Stab-Lok panel. Ask the insurer for its written rule; this is not insurance advice.

How much does it cost to replace an electrical panel?

KBR found no federal or other Tier 1 survey of panel replacement prices, so no price is given. Federal incentives set the only verified figures: the 25C credit covered up to $600 per item until 2025-12-31, and the HEEHR rebate allows up to $4,000 for a load service center upgrade for income-qualified homes.

What is a Zinsco panel?

Zinsco is a brand of residential panels and breakers sold in the same decades as FPE equipment. KBR found no CPSC recall, agency statement or court opinion about Zinsco in the records it could open; the CPSC database has 0 recalls naming it.

Do I need to replace my panel when remodeling a kitchen?

No federal rule requires it. The local permit office reviews new kitchen circuits under the adopted code, and the CPSC's 1983 guidance is to follow local building codes when adding circuits. Insurers such as Citizens may ask about the panel separately. A licensed electrician can say whether the existing panel can take the new load.

Frequently asked questions

Has Federal Pacific ever had a CPSC recall?

No. Of 10,082 recalls in the CPSC Recalls API through 2026-11-05, 0 name Federal Pacific, Stab-Lok or Zinsco.

Why did the CPSC close its FPE investigation?

Its 1983-03-03 release says the data did not establish a serious risk, staff could not accept or refute Reliance's test data, and further study would cost several million dollars against a fiscal 1983 budget of $34 million.

What did the New Jersey court decide about FPE?

In Yacout v. Federal Pacific, a 2002-10-29 order granted partial summary judgment that FPE violated the Consumer Fraud Act by knowingly distributing breakers not tested to meet UL standards as labeled. Reliance's liability was left for trial.

Who owns the Stab-Lok name now?

In the US, American Circuit Breaker Corp., which acquired it in 1988 via Challenger Electric, per a 2005 Ninth Circuit opinion; Federal Pioneer makes the breakers for it.

How many home breaker and panel recalls has the CPSC posted since 1990?

13, covering 5,022,564 announced US units, from 1990-01-01 to 2026-11-05.

What was the biggest panel recall?

Siemens and Murray breakers, load centers and meter combos made June to August 2010, about 2.2 million units, recalled 2010-09-23.

Which load centers were recalled most recently?

Square D QO Plug-On Neutral load centers made February 2020 to January 2022, about 1.4 million US units, recalled 2022-06-16 with free inspection and repair.

How common were counterfeit breaker recalls?

Five recalls from 2006 to 2010 covered 558,600 counterfeit breakers labeled Square D, 11.1% of residential recall units since 1990.

How many US homes were built when FPE and Zinsco panels were sold?

The ACS 2025 counts 65,733,775 housing units built 1950 to 1989, 44.3% of all units. That is an era count, not a panel count.

Does Citizens Florida ban Federal Pacific panels?

Its 4-Point form Insp4pt 03 25 does not name banned brands; it records panel brand, age and hazards, and agents may not submit homes with electrical hazards. Citizens requires the form for homes over 20 years old.

Download the data

Every table in this report is available as a CSV under CC BY 4.0. The fact sheet lists each value with its source URL and access date.

For journalists and researchers

If you cite only a few, cite these

  1. 13 CPSC recalls of residential breakers and load centers since 1990, 5,022,564 units, 0 naming Federal Pacific.[1]
  2. CPSC 1983: FPE breakers failed certain UL calibration tests; investigation closed without a safety determination.[3]
  3. New Jersey 2002: FPE knowingly and purposefully distributed breakers not tested to UL standards as labeled.[4]

Most quotable statistics

  • Of 10,082 CPSC recalls on file through 2026-11-05, none names Federal Pacific, Stab-Lok or Zinsco.[1]
  • The CPSC posted 13 recalls of residential breakers and load centers from 1990 to 2026, covering 5.02 million US units.[1]
  • Two recalls, Siemens in 2010 and Square D in 2022, hold 71.7% of all residential breaker and panel units recalled since 1990.[1][14][15]
  • Counterfeit breakers labeled Square D were 11.1% of recalled residential units since 1990.[1]
  • The CPSC closed its FPE inquiry in 1983 without a safety determination, citing a $34 million budget.[3]
  • 65.7 million US homes standing in 2025 were built from 1950 to 1989.[6]

Press summary

A Kitchen and Bath Renovators review of the full CPSC recall database finds that no federal recall has ever named a Federal Pacific panel, Stab-Lok breaker or Zinsco panel, among 10,082 recalls through 2026-11-05. Since 1990 the CPSC has posted 13 recalls of residential circuit breakers, AFCI and GFCI breakers, load centers and meter-panel combos, covering 5.02 million US units. Two events, Siemens in 2010 and Square D in 2022, hold 71.7% of those units, and counterfeit breakers labeled Square D add 11.1%. The FPE record rests on two documents: a 1983 CPSC release closing a two-year investigation without a safety determination, and a 2002 New Jersey order finding FPE sold breakers not tested to UL standards as labeled. The 2025 ACS counts 65.7 million homes built 1950 to 1989. Florida's Citizens requires a 4-point inspection, recording panel brand, for homes over 20 years old.

Suggested headlines

  • No federal recall has ever named a Federal Pacific panel, CPSC records show
  • 13 home breaker and panel recalls since 1990 covered 5.02 million units
  • Two recalls account for 71.7% of recalled home breakers and load centers
  • One recalled home breaker in nine was a counterfeit Square D
  • 65.7 million US homes date from the Federal Pacific and Zinsco era

How to cite this report

Kitchen and Bath Renovators. (2026). Federal Pacific Panel: The Stab-Lok Record, Zinsco and Every Breaker Recall Since 1990. Retrieved from https://kitchenandbathrenovators.com/research/federal-pacific-panel/

Reuse license

Data and tables are licensed CC BY 4.0. Attribution: “Source: Kitchen and Bath Renovators, Federal Pacific Panel: The Stab-Lok Record, Zinsco and Every Breaker Recall Since 1990” with a link to this page.

Reproduce this analysis

Every figure comes from the files below. The scripts that pulled and computed them are kept with the report and can be re-run.

DatasetPublisherSourceQuery or filterRows usedRetrieved
CPSC Recalls API, full recall list (JSON)U.S. Consumer Product Safety CommissionFile or endpointAll recalls; screen by product Type (Panelboards or Circuit Breakers or GFCIs or Fuses, Circuit Breakers, Meter Boxes, AFCI, GFCI) or title/product regex (circuit breaker, load center, panelboard, arc fault, service entrance, meter combo, meter breaker); manual scope per recall in scripts/cpsc_recalls.py. Shared copy: .tmp/datasets/cpsc/recalls_all_2026-11-08.json10,082 recalls; 9,504 since 1990; 23 candidates; 13 residential, 3 commercial, 3 pre-1990, 4 excluded2026-11-08
ACS 2025 1-year table-based summary file, B25034U.S. Census BureauFile or endpointGEO_ID 0100000US and 0400000US states plus DC (Puerto Rico dropped); B25034_E001, E006 to E011 and MOEs; read in place from .tmp/datasets/acs/2025_1yr52 rows (US, 50 states, DC)2026-11-08
ACS 2025 1-year geography fileU.S. Census BureauFile or endpointGEO_ID to NAME and STUSAB lookup52 rows matched2026-11-08

Data quality and exclusions

  • Kept 9,504 of 10,082 CPSC recalls dated 1990-01-01 or later for the count; 578 earlier recalls were reviewed only for context (3 breaker or panel recalls from 1988).
  • The type and keyword screen returned 23 candidates. 13 were classed residential, 3 commercial (MA/MH, F and K frame, PowerPact J-frame breakers), 3 pre-1990, and 4 excluded: a Woods plug-in GFCI (1991), a GFCI extension cord (1994), a Square D surge arrester (1995) and a Milbank meter socket with no breaker (2009).
  • A wider sweep of titles and descriptions for breaker, load center and maker names was read by hand; it added no recall. Square D safety switches (2006 and 2018), a Schneider surge protection device (2020) and Leviton connection devices (2020) were not counted as breakers or panels.
  • The brand search for Federal Pacific, Stab-Lok, Zinsco and FPE returned 1 match, a Honda ATV model code FPE, removed as a false positive.
  • Recall 99100a has a blank units field in the API; 12,200 units were taken from the cpsc.gov recall page. Recall 88091 carries an API date of 1998-11-01 but its text says it was issued November 1, 1988; it is listed as 1988.
  • Recall 22159 units exclude 289,000 sold in Canada. Unit text such as About 2.2 million was converted to 2,200,000.
  • ACS: Puerto Rico dropped; era MOE combined as the square root of the sum of squared decade MOEs, an approximation.

Methodology

Source selection: the CPSC Recalls API (full JSON, pulled 2026-11-08, latest record 2026-11-05) for recalls; the CPSC's 1983 release on FPE; two court records (the 2002 New Jersey order and memorandum, read from an Internet Archive capture, and a 2005 Ninth Circuit opinion); ACS 2025 1-year table B25034 (released October 29, 2026) for homes by year built; Citizens Property Insurance bulletins and its 4-Point form; one insurer bulletin (AmTrust); IRS, statute and DOE pages for incentives.

Inclusion: a recall is residential if it covers a circuit breaker, AFCI or GFCI breaker, load center, panelboard or meter-panel combo sold for homes (home centers, residential catalog lines or residential meter-mains). Large molded-case breakers sold through industrial distributors are listed but excluded from the count. Recalls before 1990 are listed as context.

Conflicts: where the API units field is blank (recall 99100a) the units come from the cpsc.gov recall page; where the API date conflicts with the release text (recall 88091) the release text is used. Insurer claims and test percentages quoted by insurers or inspectors are attributed or excluded, never stated as fact.

Derived metrics are computed in scripts/cpsc_recalls.py and scripts/acs_era.py from the raw files and stored in derived_metrics.csv. Shares sum announced units, not averages of shares.

Limitations: recall units are announced quantities; the ACS counts era homes, not panel brands; the court order is a trial-level ruling with later history unverified. Last updated 2026-11-08.

This report presents published data with its limitations. It is not legal, financial or investment advice.

Sources, ranked by quality

Tier 1: primary and official sources (21)

Tier 2: trade bodies, market research, company data (1)

Budget planner